Going From Start-Up to Acquisition | Matt Volm, CEO & Co-Founder at RevOps Co-op
Table of Contents
Matt Volm explains how his path into Revenue Operations shaped his approach to building an operator community. He also outlines what companies need to make the function effective.
Why we asked Matt
Why Revenue Operations matters
Revenue defines business performance, yet the teams generating and retaining it can become fragmented. Matt argues that Revenue Operations connects marketing, sales, and post-sales work, prioritises business impact, and supports efficient growth.
The company
RevOps Co-op
At the time of recording, Matt Volm was CEO and Co-Founder of RevOps Co-op. The global community enabled Revenue Operations practitioners to exchange ideas, develop skills, and learn from peers facing similar challenges.
How did an early-stage company lead you into Revenue Operations and community building?
My route into Revenue Operations was unplanned. As VP of Biz Ops at Ally.io, I was among roughly the first ten employees. I covered finance, accounting, legal, board meetings, and Revenue Operations.
RevOps became shorthand for marketing, sales, and customer success operations, though my background was in finance and strategy. The company grew beyond 150 employees before Microsoft acquired it, and its product became Microsoft Viva Goals. I later started RevOps Co-op, which had almost 10,000 members worldwide. My path began with qualifying as a CPA, showing that routes into RevOps are rarely linear.
How did your finance and accounting background help you lead RevOps?
Revenue Operations involves data analysis, insight, and KPIs, so finance and accounting knowledge offers practical value. It helps practitioners interpret recurring revenue, period-on-period growth, net revenue retention, and customer lifetime metrics. They can see how operational inputs reach financial statements.
That knowledge also brings discipline to routine commercial details. An agreement signed on 1 September but dated 31 August should not be recognised as August revenue. Understanding journal entries, financial reporting, and revenue-recognition timing connects sales activity with reported results. It also prevents teams from designing operational processes without considering their financial consequences.
Why has Revenue Operations grown, and what challenges follow?
I saw the function take off roughly three to three-and-a-half years before this conversation. Before starting my company in July 2020, I asked investors whether they had seen Revenue Operations emerge. Most had not. LinkedIn later identified RevOps as a fast-growing job category. The model spread from US technology companies to international markets and sectors beyond SaaS.
That growth creates a development challenge because people rarely earn Revenue Operations degrees. They often enter after receiving related responsibilities or using an existing strength. Many inherit broad remits without experienced colleagues to guide them. Communities and courses let small teams or sole practitioners test ideas, ask questions, and close internal skill gaps.
What belongs within a Revenue Operations team’s remit?
The scope should follow the name: every operation supporting the revenue engine. That includes marketing, sales, and post-sales teams such as customer success and support. Responsibility spans the people, processes, and technology behind them. Existing customers drive much of a recurring-revenue business, so retention and expansion belong within its remit.
Technology requests, including integrations, reports, and data fields, often dominate. However, RevOps must examine how people work and whether processes produce intended commercial results. Its end-to-end view can connect churn with acquisition channels, sales representatives, geographies, or other shared traits. Those findings guide investment and reveal unsuitable channels or teams closing weak deals.
What qualities should companies seek in their first RevOps practitioner?
Look for someone who has tackled unfamiliar challenges, including attempts that failed. Strong candidates accept discomfort, enter new areas, learn, and take ownership. Their experience can come from finance, sales, or another operations role. Someone who independently learned a system or repaired a neglected process demonstrates what the role requires.
Company stage determines the balance between breadth and specialisation. An established organisation with defined processes can need a specialist who owns a platform such as Marketo. An earlier-stage company building its first RevOps team generally benefits from broad skills, then narrower roles as it grows. I would favour an adaptable learner over someone limited to one system.
How can RevOps become a strategic adviser instead of fulfilling tactical requests?
RevOps often starts with technical work because it owns tools, systems, and data across marketing, sales, and post-sales. To avoid becoming an order-taking function, keep asking why. For an integration or Salesforce field, identify the desired outcome and assess the underlying process. For pipeline figures, explain why pipeline changed and recommend how the business should respond.
Building that mindset takes deliberate practice. Practitioners should extend their work and seek opportunities to learn how commercial leaders operate. Ask to attend relevant go-to-market meetings instead of awaiting an invitation. External peers, communities, courses, and specialist resources can complement internal exposure. Continued learning develops the business acumen needed to connect daily activity with company results.
How should a new RevOps leader prioritise the first 90 days?
Start by speaking with people, investigating operations, and documenting problems. Prioritise them by business impact, develop solutions, and tie each proposal to revenue growth, retention, or churn reduction. Map the process behind system requests. Sending free-trial sign-ups into Salesforce can reveal lead-scoring needs, inefficient navigation, and missed enquiries.
Deliver early value through low-effort fixes that remove friction, such as a neglected validation rule, Salesforce view, or report. Spread wins across marketing, sales, and customer success instead of favouring one stakeholder. Resist solving everything. Completing a few major projects well builds more credibility than executing a long list poorly.
Where should RevOps report, and why establish the function?
Reporting lines should preserve RevOps’ ability to serve the whole business. It should not report to one departmental leader when supporting marketing, sales, and post-sales. Under a VP of Sales, it is likely to become sales operations. A Chief Revenue Officer, COO, Biz Ops leader, or CEO can oversee it. The manager must prioritise revenue work across functions without favouring one team.
Revenue sustains operations, while growth can support further funding. A dedicated operations team can focus on efficient revenue growth, standardise working practices, and support consistent results. Separate departmental operations teams cannot offer the same unified view of acquisition, conversion, retention, and expansion.
Key takeaways
— Non-linear RevOps careers can turn adjacent finance or strategy experience into a practical advantage.
— RevOps covers marketing, sales, and post-sales across people, processes, and technology.
— Early-stage RevOps teams benefit from adaptable generalists; mature organisations can need platform specialists.
— Strategic practitioners investigate requests, interpret results, and recommend action instead of supplying data alone.
— Strong 90-day plans combine diagnosis and goal alignment with balanced early wins for every supported team.
— RevOps should report to a leader who can prioritise business impact across the revenue engine.
About the guest
Matt Volm
CEO & Co-Founder · RevOps Co-op
At the time of recording, Matt Volm was CEO and Co-Founder of RevOps Co-op, a global Revenue Operations community. His earlier experience included serving as VP of Biz Ops at Ally.io and qualifying as a CPA.
Connect on LinkedIn