HubSpot's forecast tool sits on the Deal object but works as its own layer with specific rules.
The tool filters and aggregates based on three locked criteria:
Fewer than 50% of sales leaders have high confidence in their forecasts (Gartner). That gap comes from setup quality, not feature lists.
Setup choices determine whether your tool shows trusted numbers or misleading ones.
Most guides skip this distinction.
Getting it wrong breaks everything else.
Deal Stages are step-by-step markers with fixed odds. A deal moves from "Discovery" (10%) to "Proposal Sent" (60%) to "Contract Sent" (90%).
Forecast Categories work on their own. They capture rep confidence, not process steps.
| Trait | Deal Stages | Forecast Categories |
|---|---|---|
| Logic | Linear, auto | Judgment, manual |
| Tracks | Step progress | Rep confidence |
| Updates | Stage change | Human choice |
| Risk | Stage parking | Needs oversight |
The four categories:
Why this matters: A deal is never "90% won"—it closes, or it doesn't. Stage odds create a false middle that flatters reps but misleads managers.
Forecast categories force human judgment to be separate from process steps. This matches how sales ops frameworks handle pipeline accuracy.
This toggle decides if your forecast shows human judgment or stage mapping.
When turned on, HubSpot maps deal stages to forecast categories on its own. Move a deal to "Contract Sent" and it becomes "Commit" without the rep saying so.
The setup choice:
Our take: Turn it off for teams that know their process.
A deal should only be "Commit" when a human confirms the buying signal—not because a stage gate was crossed.
The hidden catch: Auto-map overwrites manual picks when stages change. A rep sets "Best Case," moves the deal forward, and auto-map resets it to "Commit." This corrupts data and confuses users.
Build a "Red Flag" workflow instead:
This section covers the basic setup steps. Watch the video below for a visual walkthrough.
Requirements before you start:
Navigate to Settings → Objects → Forecast. This is your central hub for all forecast configuration.
Choose how deal values appear in forecasts:
Our recommendation: Start with Weighted amount if your deal probabilities are calibrated to reality.
Choose Monthly or Quarterly based on your sales cycle:
Warning: Changing this resets all goals and submissions. Get it right the first time.
This is where the auto-map decision from the previous section comes into play.
If you leave "Automate forecast categories" OFF (recommended), reps will manually set categories on deals.
Critical: Goal timing must match your forecast period exactly. Quarterly goals won't appear in a monthly view.
What's Next?
After setup, move to data hygiene workflows to keep your forecast clean.
AI-driven forecasting can reduce errors by 20 to 50 percent—yet many teams still struggle with data access (McKinsey).
Bad forecast data is rarely a software bug—it's a process gap.
The core issue: A "This Month" forecast with past-dated deals makes no sense. HubSpot warns you but won't remove them.
Key workflows to build:
Stale Deal Flow:
Close Date Check:
Stage Parking Guard:
The "Hidden Deal" problem: Deals marked "Commit" with close dates outside the viewed period vanish from rollups. Managers believe they have revenue that isn't appearing. This is the top source of forecast confusion.
Setup is one-time. Submission is ongoing. This section covers what happens every forecast period.
Forecast submission is when reps commit to a number—separate from the deals in their pipeline.
Think of it this way:
HubSpot compares both. Managers see the gap between "what the data shows" and "what the rep commits to."
Why this matters: A rep might have $500K in pipeline but know that two key deals are slipping. Their submitted forecast of $350K tells managers the real story.
Caption: "Access forecasting from the Sales menu"
If you run multiple pipelines, select the one you want to forecast:
Note: Goals are pipeline-specific. Make sure you're viewing the pipeline where your goal is assigned.
Here's how reps submit their forecast each period:
Step-by-step:
Submitted forecasts create accountability:
Common mistake: Reps who never submit leave managers guessing. Build submission into your weekly forecast cadence.
Most teams follow this rhythm:
| Cycle | When to Submit | What Managers Check |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly | Every Monday | Week-over-week changes |
| Monthly | 1st of month + mid-month | Accuracy vs. actual close |
| Quarterly | Month 1, 2, 3 of quarter | Trending toward goal |
Pro tip: Submission without deal updates is noise. Require reps to review and update their deal stages/categories before submitting their forecast number.
Teams running more than one sales motion face a specific limit.
HubSpot needs goals linked to specific pipelines. No built-in view sums rep results across all pipelines in one row.
What this means:
The Sales Workspace helps organize views but doesn't solve the gap.
Common problem: Goals not appearing in the forecast tab.
The 90% fix: Timing mismatch.
HubSpot won't split quarterly goals into months. The view filter must match the goal setting exactly.
Checklist for missing goals:
HubSpot's deal splits let up to 5 users share a deal with set amounts or percentages.
The key difference:
| Feature | Deal Splits | Deal Collaborators |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Revenue credit | View access |
| Forecast Impact | Included in user forecast | No credit |
| Use Case | Commission tracking | Project access |
The common mistake: Using Collaborators for commission tracking. Collaborators get access, not revenue credit. This causes pay disputes and forecast errors.
The reporting catch: HubSpot changed how split records work.
This breaks reports using "Deal Split" as the main object. Building complex joins to combine single-owner and split deals requires advanced reporting skills.
The choice isn't about math—both do the same sums. It's about approach.
HubSpot's way: Easy use first.
Salesforce's way: Full control first.
| Area | HubSpot Wins | Salesforce Wins |
|---|---|---|
| User uptake | ✓ Modern UI | |
| Matrix teams | ✓ Flex structure | |
| Quota depth | ✓ Product quotas | |
| Total cost | ✓ Core license | |
| Custom objects | ✓ Forecast on anything |
When to pick each:
Hitting limits in HubSpot? Overlay teams that need their own forecasts can't be set up without heavy custom work.
When forecasts look empty, run this list before calling support:
1. Access Rights Does the user have Forecast access turned on in Users & Teams?
2. Paid Seat Does the user have a Sales Hub Pro or Enterprise seat? Free seats can't forecast.
3. Goal Match Does the Revenue Goal match the exact pipeline AND year/timing of the view?
4. Close Date Are deals set to close in the period you're viewing? Past-dated deals are the top error.
5. Category Mapping Are deals in a stage mapped to "Omitted"? They vanish from rollups.
Most "bugs" reported to HubSpot Support are setup mismatches. This check catches 90% of issues.
The field is shifting from "Manager Override" to "AI Validation."
HubSpot's AI Forecast gives a machine number next to manual picks. Top teams reach 90–95% forecast accuracy with AI help (Forecastio).
The better review approach:
Only 20% of sales teams forecast within 5% of results (Xactly). Companies embedding AI in sales outperform peers with 15–30% higher ROI (McKinsey). AI helps close that gap by showing when rep picks don't match data patterns.
RevOps focus: Make sure signals (email clicks, page views) feed the AI model right. Output quality depends on input quality.
Your path to complete HubSpot forecasting setup:
Learn the structure first
Make clear setup choices
Know your limits
Fix problems step by step
Pick the right platform
Your HubSpot forecasting setup only works when the config matches your real process. Get the structure right—the features follow.